↓ Skip to main content

The Stem Cell Commons: an exemplar for data integration in the biomedical domain driven by the ISA framework.

Overview of attention for article published in AMIA Summits on Translational Science Proceedings, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Stem Cell Commons: an exemplar for data integration in the biomedical domain driven by the ISA framework.
Published in
AMIA Summits on Translational Science Proceedings, March 2013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shannan Ho Sui, Emily Merrill, Nils Gehlenborg, Psalm Haseley, Ilya Sytchev, Richard Park, Philippe Rocca-Serra, Stephane Corlosquet, Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran, Eamonn Maguire, Oliver Hofmann, Peter Park, Sudeshna Das, Susanna-Assunta Sansone, Winston Hide

Abstract

Comparisons of stem cell experiments at both molecular and semantic levels remain challenging due to inconsistencies in results, data formats, and descriptions among biomedical research discoveries. The Harvard Stem Cell Institute (HSCI) has created the Stem Cell Commons (stemcellcommons.org), an open, community-based approach to data sharing. Experimental information is integrated using the Investigation-Study-Assay tabular format (ISA-Tab) used by over 30 organizations (ISA Commons, isacommons.org). The early adoption of this format permitted the novel integration of three independent systems to facilitate stem cell data storage, exchange and analysis: the Blood Genomics Repository, the Stem Cell Discovery Engine, and the new Refinery platform that links the Galaxy analytical engine to data repositories.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 14%
Unknown 12 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 2 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 43%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Social Sciences 1 7%
Computer Science 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2013.
All research outputs
#16,051,091
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from AMIA Summits on Translational Science Proceedings
#98
of 276 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,491
of 222,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AMIA Summits on Translational Science Proceedings
#10
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 276 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.