You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
ANRIL Promoter DNA Methylation: A Perinatal Marker for Later Adiposity
|
---|---|
Published in |
EBioMedicine, April 2017
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.03.037 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Karen Lillycrop, Robert Murray, Clara Cheong, Ai Ling Teh, Rebecca Clarke-Harris, Sheila Barton, Paula Costello, Emma Garratt, Eloise Cook, Philip Titcombe, Bhuvaneshwari Shunmuganathan, Samantha J. Liew, Yong-Cai Chua, Xinyi Lin, Yonghui Wu, Graham C. Burdge, Cyrus Cooper, Hazel M. Inskip, Neerja Karnani, James C. Hopkins, Caroline E. Childs, Carolina Paras Chavez, Philip C. Calder, Fabian Yap, Yung Seng Lee, Yap Seng Chong, Philip E. Melton, Lawrie Beilin, Rae-Chi Huang, Peter D. Gluckman, Nick Harvey, Mark A. Hanson, Joanna D. Holbrook, The EpiGen Consortium, Keith M. Godfrey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 7 | 39% |
United States | 2 | 11% |
France | 2 | 11% |
Mexico | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 6 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 83% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 129 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 12% |
Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
Researcher | 12 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
Other | 23 | 18% |
Unknown | 35 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 20% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 10% |
Psychology | 5 | 4% |
Other | 16 | 12% |
Unknown | 37 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2018.
All research outputs
#1,807,480
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from EBioMedicine
#776
of 4,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,528
of 327,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EBioMedicine
#14
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,068 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.