↓ Skip to main content

Association Between Depression and Antiretroviral Therapy Use Among People Living with HIV: A Meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
Title
Association Between Depression and Antiretroviral Therapy Use Among People Living with HIV: A Meta-analysis
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10461-017-1776-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jun Tao, Sten H. Vermund, Han-Zhu Qian

Abstract

Depression is common among people living with HIV (PLHIV). Studies on the relationship between depression and use of antiretroviral therapy (ART) are inconclusive. A meta-analysis was conducted to summarize the relationship between depression and ART use among PLHIV. Ten electronic databases, conference abstracts, and dissertations were searched. A random effects meta-analysis was performed to pool the odds ratio estimates from eligible studies. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were conducted for moderator analysis. Sensitivity analysis was performed to find influential studies. A funnel plot, the Egger test, and the trim and fill analysis were used to detect publication bias. The pooled sample size was 7375 PLHIV from nine eligible studies. The pooled prevalence of depression was 41% (95% confidence interval [CI] 29-53%). The pooled ART use rate was 52% (95% CI 37-67%). PLHIV with depression were 14% less likely (pooled odds ratio [OR] = 0.86; 95% CI 0.71-1.05) to use ART than those without depression. Subgroup analyses showed that depression was significantly associated with no ART use (pooled OR 0.84; 95% CI 0.71-0.99) among studies with a prospective study design (11 estimates from nine studies). Moderator analyses did not show any statistically significant effects. The publication bias analyses showed small study effects may not exist. Depression was associated with non-use of ART among PLHIV. Studies are needed to explore this association in other countries with varied populations, as most published studies have been conducted in the United States.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 96 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Student > Master 8 8%
Other 6 6%
Other 19 20%
Unknown 26 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 13%
Psychology 8 8%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 31 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2021.
All research outputs
#6,381,101
of 25,398,331 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#931
of 3,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,174
of 323,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#12
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,398,331 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.