↓ Skip to main content

A coral-algal phase shift in Mesoamerica not driven by changes in herbivorous fish abundance

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
244 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A coral-algal phase shift in Mesoamerica not driven by changes in herbivorous fish abundance
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2017
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0174855
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jesús Ernesto Arias-González, Tak Fung, Robert M. Seymour, Joaquín Rodrigo Garza-Pérez, Gilberto Acosta-González, Yves-Marie Bozec, Craig R. Johnson

Abstract

Coral-algal phase shifts in which coral cover declines to low levels and is replaced by algae have often been documented on coral reefs worldwide. This has motivated coral reef management responses that include restriction and regulation of fishing, e.g. herbivorous fish species. However, there is evidence that eutrophication and sedimentation can be at least as important as a reduction in herbivory in causing phase shifts. These threats arise from coastal development leading to increased nutrient and sediment loads, which stimulate algal growth and negatively impact corals respectively. Here, we first present results of a dynamic process-based model demonstrating that in addition to overharvesting of herbivorous fish, bottom-up processes have the potential to precipitate coral-algal phase shifts on Mesoamerican reefs. We then provide an empirical example that exemplifies this on coral reefs off Mahahual in Mexico, where a shift from coral to algal dominance occurred over 14 years, during which there was little change in herbivore biomass but considerable development of tourist infrastructure. Our results indicate that coastal development can compromise the resilience of coral reefs and that watershed and coastal zone management together with the maintenance of functional levels of fish herbivory are critical for the persistence of coral reefs in Mesoamerica.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Honduras 1 <1%
Bermuda 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 239 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 16%
Researcher 35 14%
Student > Bachelor 31 13%
Other 14 6%
Other 25 10%
Unknown 54 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 86 35%
Environmental Science 57 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Arts and Humanities 3 1%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 65 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2019.
All research outputs
#6,851,818
of 22,965,074 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#81,208
of 195,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,547
of 309,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,566
of 4,507 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,965,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,730 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,507 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.