You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reduced intubation rates for infants after introduction of high-flow nasal prong oxygen delivery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-011-2177-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. Schibler, T. M. T. Pham, K. R. Dunster, K. Foster, A. Barlow, K. Gibbons, J. L. Hough |
| Abstract |
To describe the change in ventilatory practice in a tertiary paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) in the 5-year period after the introduction of high-flow nasal prong (HFNP) therapy in infants <24 months of age. Additionally, to identify the patient subgroups on HFNP requiring escalation of therapy to either other non-invasive or invasive ventilation, and to identify any adverse events associated with HFNP therapy. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Iceland | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 234 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 38 | 16% |
| Other | 36 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 23 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 8% |
| Other | 50 | 21% |
| Unknown | 42 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 148 | 61% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Unknown | 56 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2018.
All research outputs
#2,917,634
of 22,733,113 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,817
of 4,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,181
of 108,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#4
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,733,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,970 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.