↓ Skip to main content

A dislocation-based, strain–gradient–plasticity strengthening model for deformation processed metal–metal composites

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Materials Science, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
A dislocation-based, strain–gradient–plasticity strengthening model for deformation processed metal–metal composites
Published in
Journal of Materials Science, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10853-013-7982-5
Authors

Liang Tian, Alan Russell, Iver Anderson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 19%
Researcher 3 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 9 35%
Engineering 6 23%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Unknown 9 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2017.
All research outputs
#7,525,196
of 22,965,074 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#939
of 4,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,415
of 305,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#7
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,965,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,630 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.