↓ Skip to main content

Methodology for developing quality indicators for the care of older people in the Emergency Department

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Emergency Medicine, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Methodology for developing quality indicators for the care of older people in the Emergency Department
Published in
BMC Emergency Medicine, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-227x-13-23
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melinda Martin-Khan, Ellen Burkett, Linda Schnitker, Richard N Jones, Leonard C Gray

Abstract

Compared with younger people, older people have a higher risk of adverse health outcomes when presenting to emergency departments. As the population ages, older people will make up an increasing proportion of the emergency department population. Therefore it is timely that consideration be given to the quality of care received by older persons in emergency departments, and to consideration of those older people with special needs. Particular attention will be focused on important groups of older people, such as patients with cognitive impairment, residents of long term care and patients with palliative care needs. This project will develop a suite of quality indicators focused on the care of older persons in the emergency department.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 99 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 15%
Student > Master 10 10%
Researcher 9 9%
Librarian 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 32 31%
Unknown 20 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 23%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Psychology 6 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 25 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2014.
All research outputs
#13,259,840
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Emergency Medicine
#365
of 781 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,369
of 312,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Emergency Medicine
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 781 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.