↓ Skip to main content

The biological side of social determinants: Neural costs of childhood poverty

Overview of attention for article published in PROSPECTS, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
The biological side of social determinants: Neural costs of childhood poverty
Published in
PROSPECTS, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11125-017-9390-0
Authors

Sebastián J. Lipina

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 17%
Student > Master 10 12%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 14 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 27%
Social Sciences 9 11%
Arts and Humanities 7 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 21 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2019.
All research outputs
#5,308,138
of 24,929,945 outputs
Outputs from PROSPECTS
#138
of 494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,343
of 313,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PROSPECTS
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,929,945 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 494 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.