You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Insufficient nutritional knowledge among health care workers?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Nutrition, March 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.clnu.2007.10.014 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Morten Mowe, Ingvar Bosaeus, Henrik Højgaard Rasmussen, Jens Kondrup, Mitra Unosson, Elisabet Rothenberg, Øivind Irtun, The Scandinavian Nutrition group |
| Abstract |
Though a great interest and willingness to nutrition therapy, there is an insufficient practice compared to the proposed ESPEN guidelines for nutrition therapy. The aim of this questionnaire was to study doctors and nurses' self-reported knowledge in nutritional practice, with focus on ESPEN's guidelines in nutritional screening, assessment and treatment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
| Sweden | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Faroe Islands | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 248 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 46 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 44 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 9% |
| Other | 16 | 6% |
| Researcher | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 43 | 17% |
| Unknown | 66 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 73 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 53 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 8% |
| Unknown | 77 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2021.
All research outputs
#6,981,937
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Nutrition
#1,571
of 3,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,392
of 99,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Nutrition
#9
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,762 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.