↓ Skip to main content

Tracking human sewage microbiome in a municipal wastewater treatment plant

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
1 patent
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
229 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Tracking human sewage microbiome in a municipal wastewater treatment plant
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, December 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00253-013-5402-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lin Cai, Feng Ju, Tong Zhang

Abstract

Human sewage pollution is a major threat to public health because sewage always comes with pathogens. Human sewage is usually received and treated by wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) to control pathogenic risks and ameliorate environmental health. However, untreated sewage that flows into water environments may cause serious waterborne diseases, as reported in India and Bangladesh. To examine the fate of the human sewage microbiome in a local municipal WWTP of Hong Kong, we used massively parallel sequencing of 16S rRNA gene to systematically profile microbial communities in samples from three sections (i.e., influent, activated sludge, and effluent) obtained monthly throughout 1 year. The results indicated that: (1) influent sewage bacterial profile reflected the human microbiome; (2) human gut bacterial community was the dominant force shaping influent sewage bacterial profile; (3) most human sewage bacteria could be effectively removed by the WWTP; (4) a total of 75 genera were profiled as potentially pathogenic bacteria, most of which were still present in the effluent although at a very low level; (5) a grouped pattern of bacterial community was observed among the same section samples but a dispersed pattern was found among the different section samples; and (6) activated sludge was less affected by the influent sewage bacteria, but it showed a significant impact on the effluent bacteria. All of these findings provide novel insights toward a mechanistic understanding of the fate of human sewage microbiome in the WWTP.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 4 2%
Germany 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Cuba 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 217 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 24%
Researcher 31 14%
Student > Master 31 14%
Student > Bachelor 24 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 33 14%
Unknown 43 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 22%
Environmental Science 30 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 10%
Engineering 22 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 5%
Other 35 15%
Unknown 56 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2021.
All research outputs
#5,089,278
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#1,221
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,751
of 316,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#17
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.