You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evidence that supports policies to delay cervical screening until after age 25 years
|
---|---|
Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, March 2017
|
DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.160636 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
James A Dickinson, Gina Ogilvie, Dirk Van Niekerk, Cathy Popadiuk |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 20% |
Student > Master | 6 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
Researcher | 3 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 9% |
Other | 7 | 20% |
Unknown | 6 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 40% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 14% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 11% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 7 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,671,350
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#2,059
of 8,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,087
of 307,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#32
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.