↓ Skip to main content

Protein Function Prediction

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Protein Function Prediction'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Using PFP and ESG Protein Function Prediction Web Servers
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 GHOSTX: A Fast Sequence Homology Search Tool for Functional Annotation of Metagenomic Data
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 From Gene Annotation to Function Prediction for Metagenomics
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 An Agile Functional Analysis of Metagenomic Data Using SUPER-FOCUS
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 MPFit: Computational Tool for Predicting Moonlighting Proteins
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Predicting Secretory Proteins with SignalP
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 The ProFunc Function Prediction Server
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 G-LoSA for Prediction of Protein-Ligand Binding Sites and Structures
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Local Alignment of Ligand Binding Sites in Proteins for Polypharmacology and Drug Repositioning
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 WATsite2.0 with PyMOL Plugin: Hydration Site Prediction and Visualization
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Enzyme Annotation and Metabolic Reconstruction Using KEGG
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Ortholog Identification and Comparative Analysis of Microbial Genomes Using MBGD and RECOG
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Exploring Protein Function Using the Saccharomyces Genome Database
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Network-Based Gene Function Prediction in Mouse and Other Model Vertebrates Using MouseNet Server
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 The FANTOM5 Computation Ecosystem: Genomic Information Hub for Promoters and Active Enhancers
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Multi-Algorithm Particle Simulations with Spatiocyte
Attention for Chapter 4: An Agile Functional Analysis of Metagenomic Data Using SUPER-FOCUS
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
An Agile Functional Analysis of Metagenomic Data Using SUPER-FOCUS
Chapter number 4
Book title
Protein Function Prediction
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-7015-5_4
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-7013-1, 978-1-4939-7015-5, 978-1-4939-7013-1, 978-1-4939-7015-5
Authors

Genivaldo Gueiros Z. Silva, Fabyano A. C. Lopes, Robert A. Edwards

Editors

Daisuke Kihara

Abstract

One of the main goals in metagenomics is to identify the functional profile of a microbial community from unannotated shotgun sequencing reads. Functional annotation is important in biological research because it enables researchers to identify the abundance of functional genes of the organisms present in the sample, answering the question, "What can the organisms in the sample do?" Most currently available approaches do not scale with increasing data volumes, which is important because both the number and lengths of the reads provided by sequencing platforms keep increasing. Here, we present SUPER-FOCUS, SUbsystems Profile by databasE Reduction using FOCUS, an agile homology-based approach using a reduced reference database to report the subsystems present in metagenomic datasets and profile their abundances. SUPER-FOCUS was tested with real metagenomes, and the results show that it accurately predicts the subsystems present in the profiled microbial communities, is computationally efficient, and up to 1000 times faster than other tools. SUPER-FOCUS is freely available at http://edwards.sdsu.edu/SUPERFOCUS .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Other 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 20%
Computer Science 1 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2017.
All research outputs
#15,288,925
of 23,498,099 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,881
of 13,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,004
of 311,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#95
of 271 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,498,099 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,368 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 271 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.