↓ Skip to main content

Nitrogen Removal from Wastewater by Coupling Anammox and Methane-Dependent Denitrification in a Membrane Biofilm Reactor

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science & Technology, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
214 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
230 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nitrogen Removal from Wastewater by Coupling Anammox and Methane-Dependent Denitrification in a Membrane Biofilm Reactor
Published in
Environmental Science & Technology, September 2013
DOI 10.1021/es402775z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ying Shi, Shihu Hu, Juqing Lou, Peili Lu, Jurg Keller, Zhiguo Yuan

Abstract

This work demonstrates, for the first time, the feasibility of nitrogen removal by using the synergy of anammox and denitrifying anaerobic methane oxidation (DAMO) microorganisms in a membrane biofilm reactor (MBfR). The reactor was fed with synthetic wastewater containing nitrate and ammonium. Methane was delivered from the interior of hollow fibres in the MBfR to the biofilm that grew on the fiber's outer wall. After 24 months of operation, the system achieved a nitrate and an ammonium removal rate of about 190 mgN L(-1) d(-1) (or 86 mgN m(-2) d(-1), with m(2) referring to biofilm surface area) and 60 mgN L(-1) d(-1) (27 mgN m(-2) d(-1)), respectively. No nitrite accumulation was observed. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis indicated that DAMO bacteria (20-30%), DAMO archaea (20-30%) and anammox bacteria (20-30%) jointly dominated the microbial community. Based on the known metabolism of these microorganisms, mass balance, and isotope studies, we hypothesize that DAMO archaea converted nitrate, both externally fed and produced by anammox, to nitrite, with methane as the electron donor. Anammox and DAMO bacteria jointly removed the nitrite produced, with ammonium and methane as the electron donor, respectively. The process could potentially be used for anaerobic nitrogen removal from wastewater streams containing ammonium and nitrate/nitrite.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 222 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 33%
Researcher 26 11%
Student > Master 26 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 8%
Student > Bachelor 18 8%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 41 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 62 27%
Engineering 33 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 11%
Chemical Engineering 12 5%
Unspecified 11 5%
Other 33 14%
Unknown 54 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2013.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#16,830
of 20,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,747
of 215,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#188
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.