↓ Skip to main content

To Aggregate or Not to Aggregate: Steps for Developing and Validating Higher-Order Multidimensional Constructs

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business and Psychology, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
732 Mendeley
Title
To Aggregate or Not to Aggregate: Steps for Developing and Validating Higher-Order Multidimensional Constructs
Published in
Journal of Business and Psychology, July 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10869-011-9238-1
Authors

Russell E. Johnson, Christopher C. Rosen, Chu-Hsiang Chang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 732 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 8 1%
United States 6 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 8 1%
Unknown 699 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 278 38%
Student > Doctoral Student 79 11%
Student > Master 67 9%
Lecturer 50 7%
Researcher 32 4%
Other 130 18%
Unknown 96 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 297 41%
Social Sciences 116 16%
Psychology 67 9%
Computer Science 29 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 22 3%
Other 78 11%
Unknown 123 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2013.
All research outputs
#16,188,009
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business and Psychology
#337
of 534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,992
of 117,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business and Psychology
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.