↓ Skip to main content

Chimeric antigen receptors for the adoptive T cell therapy of hematologic malignancies

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Hematology, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 1,490)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
40 X users
patent
12 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
Title
Chimeric antigen receptors for the adoptive T cell therapy of hematologic malignancies
Published in
International Journal of Hematology, December 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12185-013-1479-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco L. Davila, Diana C. G. Bouhassira, Jae H. Park, Kevin J. Curran, Eric L. Smith, Hollie J. Pegram, Renier Brentjens

Abstract

The genetic modification of autologous T cells with chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) represents a breakthrough for gene engineering as a cancer therapy for hematologic malignancies. By targeting the CD19 antigen, we have demonstrated robust and rapid anti-leukemia activity in patients with heavily pre-treated and chemotherapy-refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). We demonstrated rapid induction of deep molecular remissions in adults, which has been recently confirmed in a case report involving a child with B-ALL. In contrast to the results when treating B-ALL, outcomes have been more modest in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or other non-hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). We review the clinical trial experience targeting B-ALL and CLL and speculate on the possible reasons for the different outcomes and propose potential optimization to CAR T cell therapy when targeting CLL or other indolent NHL. Lastly, we discuss the pre-clinical development and potential for clinical translation for using CAR T cells against multiple myeloma and acute myeloid leukemia. We highlight the potential risks and benefits by targeting these poor outcome hematologic malignancies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 178 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 16%
Student > Bachelor 29 16%
Researcher 26 14%
Student > Master 24 13%
Other 15 8%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 38 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 5%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 36 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,125,289
of 25,345,468 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Hematology
#10
of 1,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,040
of 320,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Hematology
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,345,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,490 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.