You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Addressing reproducibility in single-laboratory phenotyping experiments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Methods, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nmeth.4259 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Neri Kafkafi, Ilan Golani, Iman Jaljuli, Hugh Morgan, Tal Sarig, Hanno Würbel, Shay Yaacoby, Yoav Benjamini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 12% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Belgium | 1 | 6% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 47% |
| Members of the public | 7 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 18% |
| Professor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 11 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 9% |
| Mathematics | 3 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2018.
All research outputs
#4,517,025
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#3,225
of 5,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,064
of 327,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#58
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,404 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.