↓ Skip to main content

The turgor pressure of growing lily pollen tubes

Overview of attention for article published in Protoplasma, March 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
147 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
The turgor pressure of growing lily pollen tubes
Published in
Protoplasma, March 1997
DOI 10.1007/bf01282125
Authors

Rainer Benkert, Gerhard Obermeyer, Friedrich-Wilhelm Bentrup

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 3 4%
Unknown 70 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 26%
Researcher 17 23%
Student > Postgraduate 8 11%
Student > Master 5 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 5%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 12%
Engineering 6 8%
Physics and Astronomy 5 7%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 10 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2017.
All research outputs
#7,526,794
of 22,968,808 outputs
Outputs from Protoplasma
#134
of 978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,454
of 30,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Protoplasma
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,968,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 978 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them