↓ Skip to main content

Multiplexed assay for protein quantitation in the invertebrate Gammarus fossarum by liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Multiplexed assay for protein quantitation in the invertebrate Gammarus fossarum by liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00216-017-0348-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aurore Charnot, Duarte Gouveia, Jean Armengaud, Christine Almunia, Arnaud Chaumot, Jérôme Lemoine, Olivier Geffard, Arnaud Salvador

Abstract

A highly multiplexed liquid chromatography mass spectrometry-selected reaction monitoring (SRM)-based assay for determination of 40 potential protein biomarkers from Gammarus fossarum, an ecotoxicological relevant species, was described. The assay relies on 71 stable isotope-labeled reported peptide standards for the quantitation of proteins of interest in relation to essential physiological functions such as reproductive cycle, defense mechanism, and enzymes involved in homeostasis process and in energy. A direct linear relationship between the spiked peptide concentration and the area under the peak was clearly demonstrated in biological extracts. Precision and accuracy were determined to be between 1.1 and 21% and between 79 and 120%, respectively, depending on the selected protein in a few samples after optimization of digestion conditions. The validity of the assay was documented for several biomarkers linked with reproduction and the molting process was performed with the assessment of protein levels throughout contrasted physiological process (sex, reproductive status). This assay is easy to use, robust, sensitive, and has high-throughput capabilities. The proposed strategy may be extended to any non-model organisms relevant in environmental science. Graphical abstract ᅟ.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Professor 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 5 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 3 18%
Environmental Science 2 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 6 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2017.
All research outputs
#17,289,387
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#5,671
of 9,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,259
of 323,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#50
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.