| Title |
What Reviewers Should Expect from Authors Regarding Common Method Bias in Organizational Research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Business and Psychology, May 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10869-010-9181-6 |
| Authors |
James M. Conway, Charles E. Lance |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Poland | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,895 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 22 | 1% |
| United States | 19 | 1% |
| Germany | 5 | <1% |
| France | 4 | <1% |
| Australia | 4 | <1% |
| India | 4 | <1% |
| Portugal | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 21 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1807 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 622 | 33% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 202 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 182 | 10% |
| Researcher | 108 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 98 | 5% |
| Other | 384 | 20% |
| Unknown | 299 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 771 | 41% |
| Psychology | 251 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 231 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 52 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 45 | 2% |
| Other | 165 | 9% |
| Unknown | 380 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2017.
All research outputs
#15,169,685
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business and Psychology
#303
of 559 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,321
of 107,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business and Psychology
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 559 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.