| Title |
Cortical Thickness in Children Receiving Intensive Therapy for Idiopathic Apraxia of Speech
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brain Topography, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10548-013-0308-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Darren S. Kadis, Debra Goshulak, Aravind Namasivayam, Margit Pukonen, Robert Kroll, Luc F. De Nil, Elizabeth W. Pang, Jason P. Lerch |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 110 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 14% |
| Researcher | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 24 | 21% |
| Unknown | 25 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 17% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 13% |
| Psychology | 9 | 8% |
| Linguistics | 8 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 19% |
| Unknown | 33 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2017.
All research outputs
#20,418,183
of 22,968,808 outputs
Outputs from Brain Topography
#423
of 485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,608
of 199,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Topography
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,968,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 485 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.