↓ Skip to main content

Dynamic causal modelling for EEG and MEG

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Neurodynamics, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
184 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
440 Mendeley
Title
Dynamic causal modelling for EEG and MEG
Published in
Cognitive Neurodynamics, April 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11571-008-9038-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefan J. Kiebel, Marta I. Garrido, Rosalyn J. Moran, Karl J. Friston

Abstract

Dynamic Causal Modelling (DCM) is an approach first introduced for the analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to quantify effective connectivity between brain areas. Recently, this framework has been extended and established in the magneto/encephalography (M/EEG) domain. DCM for M/EEG entails the inversion a full spatiotemporal model of evoked responses, over multiple conditions. This model rests on a biophysical and neurobiological generative model for electrophysiological data. A generative model is a prescription of how data are generated. The inversion of a DCM provides conditional densities on the model parameters and, indeed on the model itself. These densities enable one to answer key questions about the underlying system. A DCM comprises two parts; one part describes the dynamics within and among neuronal sources, and the second describes how source dynamics generate data in the sensors, using the lead-field. The parameters of this spatiotemporal model are estimated using a single (iterative) Bayesian procedure. In this paper, we will motivate and describe the current DCM framework. Two examples show how the approach can be applied to M/EEG experiments.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 440 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 2%
United Kingdom 8 2%
Germany 4 <1%
France 2 <1%
Finland 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 8 2%
Unknown 402 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 140 32%
Researcher 81 18%
Student > Master 46 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 26 6%
Student > Bachelor 22 5%
Other 76 17%
Unknown 49 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 85 19%
Neuroscience 80 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 12%
Engineering 47 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 8%
Other 78 18%
Unknown 66 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2013.
All research outputs
#20,211,690
of 22,733,113 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Neurodynamics
#287
of 319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,773
of 80,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Neurodynamics
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,733,113 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 319 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.