| Title |
Variability and Vulnerability of Coastal ‘Blue Carbon’ Stocks: A Case Study from Southeast Australia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecosystems, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10021-017-0150-z |
| Authors |
Carolyn J. Ewers Lewis, Paul E. Carnell, Jonathan Sanderman, Jeffrey A. Baldock, Peter I. Macreadie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 14 | 30% |
| United States | 8 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 9% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Lebanon | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 14 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 61% |
| Scientists | 15 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 192 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 10% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 11% |
| Unknown | 51 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 73 | 38% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 16% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 21 | 11% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 56 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,141,242
of 25,563,770 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#71
of 1,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,422
of 324,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#4
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,563,770 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.