↓ Skip to main content

Increasing the safety and efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Protein & Cell, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
16 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
Title
Increasing the safety and efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy
Published in
Protein & Cell, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s13238-017-0411-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hua Li, Yangbing Zhao

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is a promising cancer treatment that has recently been undergoing rapid development. However, there are still some major challenges, including precise tumor targeting to avoid off-target or "on-target/off-tumor" toxicity, adequate T cell infiltration and migration to solid tumors and T cell proliferation and persistence across the physical and biochemical barriers of solid tumors. In this review, we focus on the primary challenges and strategies to design safe and effective CAR T cells, including using novel cutting-edge technologies for CAR and vector designs to increase both the safety and efficacy, further T cell modification to overcome the tumor-associated immune suppression, and using gene editing technologies to generate universal CAR T cells. All these efforts promote the development and evolution of CAR T cell therapy and move toward our ultimate goal-curing cancer with high safety, high efficacy, and low cost.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 204 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 43 21%
Researcher 26 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 12%
Student > Master 24 12%
Other 9 4%
Other 24 12%
Unknown 55 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 39 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 27 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 4%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 60 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,573,957
of 23,923,788 outputs
Outputs from Protein & Cell
#94
of 775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,365
of 312,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Protein & Cell
#6
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,923,788 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 775 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.