↓ Skip to main content

Chemical Synthesis, 3D Structure, and ASIC Binding Site of the Toxin Mambalgin‐2

Overview of attention for article published in Angewandte Chemie. International Edition, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chemical Synthesis, 3D Structure, and ASIC Binding Site of the Toxin Mambalgin‐2
Published in
Angewandte Chemie. International Edition, December 2013
DOI 10.1002/anie.201308898
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christina I. Schroeder, Lachlan D. Rash, Xavier Vila‐Farrés, K. Johan Rosengren, Mehdi Mobli, Glenn F. King, Paul F. Alewood, David J. Craik, Thomas Durek

Abstract

Mambalgins are a novel class of snake venom components that exert potent analgesic effects mediated through the inhibition of acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs). The 57-residue polypeptide mambalgin-2 (Ma-2) was synthesized by using a combination of solid-phase peptide synthesis and native chemical ligation. The structure of the synthetic toxin, determined using homonuclear NMR, revealed an unusual three-finger toxin fold reminiscent of functionally unrelated snake toxins. Electrophysiological analysis of Ma-2 on wild-type and mutant ASIC1a receptors allowed us to identify α-helix 5, which borders on the functionally critical acidic pocket of the channel, as a major part of the Ma-2 binding site. This region is also crucial for the interaction of ASIC1a with the spider toxin PcTx1, thus suggesting that the binding sites for these toxins substantially overlap. This work lays the foundation for structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies and further development of this promising analgesic peptide.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 74 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 20%
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Professor 3 4%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 28%
Chemistry 13 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 12 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2013.
All research outputs
#15,740,505
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Angewandte Chemie. International Edition
#34,376
of 49,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,485
of 320,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Angewandte Chemie. International Edition
#374
of 596 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 49,995 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 596 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.