| Title |
Reliability and validity of spinal coordination patterns during treadmill walking in persons with thoracic spine pain – a preliminary study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-14-345 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jean Wessel, Michael R Pierrynowski, Kelly Pennell, Linda J Woodhouse |
| Abstract |
Persons with low back pain fail to show the same transition as healthy individuals from in-phase to anti-phase rotation of the thorax and pelvis as walking speed increases. The purpose of this study was to determine if the relative phase of the thorax and pelvis during walking was a reliable (within day test-retest) and valid measure for persons with thoracic pain. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 33% |
| Germany | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 15% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 18% |
| Unknown | 18 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 20% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 8% |
| Engineering | 4 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 21 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2013.
All research outputs
#14,831,163
of 24,978,429 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,056
of 4,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,364
of 320,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#36
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,978,429 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,350 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.