| Title |
The Basic Science of Tendinopathy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, May 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-008-0286-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yinghua Xu, George A. C. Murrell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 16% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 5% |
| Chile | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 89% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 484 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 6 | 1% |
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Ukraine | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 462 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 73 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 66 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 58 | 12% |
| Researcher | 53 | 11% |
| Other | 30 | 6% |
| Other | 107 | 22% |
| Unknown | 97 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 145 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 46 | 10% |
| Sports and Recreations | 44 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 7% |
| Engineering | 33 | 7% |
| Other | 61 | 13% |
| Unknown | 120 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,204,999
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#577
of 7,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,899
of 101,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#5
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.