↓ Skip to main content

Parathyroid Surgery in the Elderly: Should Minimally Invasive Surgery Be Abandoned?

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Parathyroid Surgery in the Elderly: Should Minimally Invasive Surgery Be Abandoned?
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, December 2013
DOI 10.1245/s10434-013-3402-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michal Mekel, Hayim Gilshtein, Katya Chapchay, Bishara Bishara, Michael M. Krausz, Herbert R. Freund, Yoram Kluger, Ahmed Eid, Haggi Mazeh

Abstract

Single adenoma is the cause of 80 % of primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) resulting in wide acceptance of minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP). The incidence of PHPT increases with age. Little information is available regarding the prevalence of multiglandular disease (MGD) in older patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Lecturer 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 5 28%
Unknown 3 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2013.
All research outputs
#18,357,514
of 22,736,112 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#4,965
of 6,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,825
of 306,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#48
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,736,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,437 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.