↓ Skip to main content

Molecular mechanisms of natural killer cell activation in response to cellular stress

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Death & Differentiation, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
patent
5 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
162 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
420 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Molecular mechanisms of natural killer cell activation in response to cellular stress
Published in
Cell Death & Differentiation, April 2013
DOI 10.1038/cdd.2013.26
Pubmed ID
Authors

C J Chan, M J Smyth, L Martinet

Abstract

Protection against cellular stress from various sources, such as nutritional, physical, pathogenic, or oncogenic, results in the induction of both intrinsic and extrinsic cellular protection mechanisms that collectively limit the damage these insults inflict on the host. The major extrinsic protection mechanism against cellular stress is the immune system. Indeed, it has been well described that cells that are stressed due to association with viral infection or early malignant transformation can be directly sensed by the immune system, particularly natural killer (NK) cells. Although the ability of NK cells to directly recognize and respond to stressed cells is well appreciated, the mechanisms and the breadth of cell-intrinsic responses that are intimately linked with their activation are only beginning to be uncovered. This review will provide a brief introduction to NK cells and the relevant receptors and ligands involved in direct responses to cellular stress. This will be followed by an in-depth discussion surrounding the various intrinsic responses to stress that can naturally engage NK cells, and how therapeutic agents may induce specific activation of NK cells and other innate immune cells by activating cellular responses to stress.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 420 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 411 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 93 22%
Student > Bachelor 62 15%
Researcher 61 15%
Student > Master 57 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 33 8%
Other 46 11%
Unknown 68 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 112 27%
Immunology and Microbiology 72 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 68 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 58 14%
Engineering 9 2%
Other 31 7%
Unknown 70 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,433,474
of 25,323,244 outputs
Outputs from Cell Death & Differentiation
#317
of 3,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,475
of 205,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Death & Differentiation
#3
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,323,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.