↓ Skip to main content

Scale criticality in estimating ecosystem carbon dynamics

Overview of attention for article published in Global Change Biology, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Scale criticality in estimating ecosystem carbon dynamics
Published in
Global Change Biology, May 2014
DOI 10.1111/gcb.12496
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shuqing Zhao, Shuguang Liu

Abstract

Scaling is central to ecology and Earth system sciences. However, the importance of scale (i.e. resolution and extent) for understanding carbon dynamics across scales is poorly understood and quantified. We simulated carbon dynamics under a wide range of combinations of resolution (nine spatial resolutions of 250 m, 500 m, 1 km, 2 km, 5 km, 10 km, 20 km, 50 km, and 100 km) and extent (57 geospatial extents ranging from 108 to 1 247 034 km(2) ) in the southeastern United States to explore the existence of scale dependence of the simulated regional carbon balance. Results clearly show the existence of a critical threshold resolution for estimating carbon sequestration within a given extent and an error limit. Furthermore, an invariant power law scaling relationship was found between the critical resolution and the spatial extent as the critical resolution is proportional to A(n) (n is a constant, and A is the extent). Scale criticality and the power law relationship might be driven by the power law probability distributions of land surface and ecological quantities including disturbances at landscape to regional scales. The current overwhelming practices without considering scale criticality might have largely contributed to difficulties in balancing carbon budgets at regional and global scales.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
United Kingdom 2 3%
Germany 1 1%
Malaysia 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 59 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 35%
Researcher 16 24%
Professor 3 4%
Student > Postgraduate 3 4%
Student > Bachelor 2 3%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 24 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 18%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 16 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2014.
All research outputs
#19,290,136
of 24,558,777 outputs
Outputs from Global Change Biology
#5,764
of 6,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,716
of 232,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Change Biology
#127
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,558,777 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,096 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.