You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Ileorectal anastomosis in comparison with ileal pouch anal anastomosis in reconstructive surgery for ulcerative colitis — a single institution experience☆Conference presentations: Swedish surgical society; Gothenburg, 2010. ECCO annual meeting; Vienna, 2013.
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Crohn's and Colitis Supplements, December 2013
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.crohns.2013.11.014 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Peter Andersson, Rickard Norblad, Johan D. Söderholm, Pär Myrelid |
Abstract |
Ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the standard procedure for reconstruction after colectomy for ulcerative colitis (UC). However, ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) as an alternative has, recently experienced a revival. This study from a single center compares the clinical outcomes of these procedures. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sweden | 2 | 40% |
United States | 1 | 20% |
Denmark | 1 | 20% |
Spain | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 105 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 18% |
Student > Master | 13 | 12% |
Researcher | 11 | 10% |
Other | 7 | 7% |
Professor | 6 | 6% |
Other | 23 | 22% |
Unknown | 26 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 55% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 6% |
Unknown | 31 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2018.
All research outputs
#14,600,553
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Crohn's and Colitis Supplements
#1,210
of 2,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,761
of 320,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Crohn's and Colitis Supplements
#11
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,227 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.