↓ Skip to main content

A Reliability Generalization on the Children’s Hope Scale

Overview of attention for article published in Child Indicators Research, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
A Reliability Generalization on the Children’s Hope Scale
Published in
Child Indicators Research, April 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12187-017-9467-6
Authors

Chan M. Hellman, Ricky T. Munoz, Jody A. Worley, Jessica A. Feeley, Jeanne E. Gillert

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 10 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 6 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 13%
Psychology 2 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2017.
All research outputs
#20,418,183
of 22,968,808 outputs
Outputs from Child Indicators Research
#283
of 300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,842
of 309,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child Indicators Research
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,968,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.