You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development and Initial Evaluation of an Internet-Based Support System for Face-to-Face Cognitive Behavior Therapy: A Proof of Concept Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Internet Research, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2196/jmir.3031 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kristoffer NT Månsson, Erica Skagius Ruiz, Elisabet Gervind, Mats Dahlin, Gerhard Andersson |
| Abstract |
Evidence-based psychological treatments, such as cognitive behavior therapy (CBT), have been found to be effective in treating several anxiety and mood disorders. Nevertheless, issues regarding adherence are common, such as poor patient compliance on homework assignments and therapists' drifting from strictly evidence-based CBT. The development of Internet-delivered CBT (ICBT) has been intensive in the past decade and results show that guided ICBT can be as effective as face-to-face CBT but also indicate a need to integrate the two forms of CBT delivery. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 29% |
| India | 3 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 19% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 224 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 17% |
| Researcher | 34 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 28 | 12% |
| Unknown | 53 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 81 | 35% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 9% |
| Unknown | 65 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2019.
All research outputs
#2,023,469
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#1,690
of 7,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,242
of 320,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#24
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,864 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.