You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
British Association for Psychopharmacology consensus guidance on the use of psychotropic medication preconception, in pregnancy and postpartum 2017
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Psychopharmacology, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1177/0269881117699361 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R Hamish McAllister-Williams, David S Baldwin, Roch Cantwell, Abby Easter, Eilish Gilvarry, Vivette Glover, Lucian Green, Alain Gregoire, Louise M Howard, Ian Jones, Hind Khalifeh, Anne Lingford-Hughes, Elizabeth McDonald, Nadia Micali, Carmine M Pariante, Lesley Peters, Ann Roberts, Natalie C Smith, David Taylor, Angelika Wieck, Laura M Yates, Allan H Young, endorsed by the British Association for Psychopharmacology |
| Abstract |
Decisions about the use of psychotropic medication in pregnancy are an ongoing challenge for clinicians and women with mental health problems, owing to the uncertainties around risks of the illness itself to mother and fetus/infant, effectiveness of medications in pregnancy and risks to the fetus/infant from in utero exposure or via breast milk. These consensus guidelines aim to provide pragmatic advice regarding these issues. They are divided into sections on risks of untreated illness in pregnancy; general principles of using drugs in the perinatal period; benefits and harms associated with individual drugs; and recommendations for the management of specific disorders. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| Turkey | 2 | 20% |
| Germany | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 40% |
| Scientists | 4 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 508 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 508 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 63 | 12% |
| Researcher | 48 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 39 | 8% |
| Other | 34 | 7% |
| Other | 116 | 23% |
| Unknown | 166 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 146 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 50 | 10% |
| Psychology | 43 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 22 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 14 | 3% |
| Other | 44 | 9% |
| Unknown | 189 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,676,256
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Psychopharmacology
#330
of 2,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,367
of 327,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Psychopharmacology
#5
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,078 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.