↓ Skip to main content

Intramuscular fat infiltration evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging predicts the extensibility of the supraspinatus muscle

Overview of attention for article published in Muscle & Nerve, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intramuscular fat infiltration evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging predicts the extensibility of the supraspinatus muscle
Published in
Muscle & Nerve, May 2017
DOI 10.1002/mus.25673
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hugo Giambini, Taku Hatta, Krzysztof R. Gorny, Per Widholm, Anette Karlsson, Olof D. Leinhard, Mark C. Adkins, Chunfeng Zhao, Kai‐Nan An

Abstract

Rotator cuff (RC) tears result in muscle atrophy and fat infiltration within the RC muscles. An estimation of muscle quality and deformation, or extensibility, is useful in selecting the most appropriate surgical procedure. We determined if non-invasive quantitative assessment of intramuscular fat using MRI could be used to predict extensibility of the supraspinatus (SSP) muscle. Seventeen cadaveric shoulders were imaged to assess intramuscular fat infiltration. Extensibility and histological evaluations were then performed. Quantitative fat infiltration positively correlated with histological findings and presented a positive correlation with muscle extensibility (r = 0.69; p = 0.002). Extensibility was not significantly different between shoulders graded with a higher fat content vs. those with low fat when implementing qualitative methods. A non-invasive prediction of whole-muscle extensibility may directly guide pre-operative planning to determine if the torn edge could efficiently cover the original footprint while aiding in postoperative evaluation of RC repair. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 19%
Student > Postgraduate 7 13%
Student > Master 7 13%
Other 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 11 21%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 19%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Sports and Recreations 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 18 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2017.
All research outputs
#17,890,958
of 22,968,808 outputs
Outputs from Muscle & Nerve
#2,170
of 2,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,719
of 309,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Muscle & Nerve
#52
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,968,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,860 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.