↓ Skip to main content

Applying the workload indicators of staffing need (WISN) method in Namibia: challenges and implications for human resources for health policy

Overview of attention for article published in Human Resources for Health, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
287 Mendeley
Title
Applying the workload indicators of staffing need (WISN) method in Namibia: challenges and implications for human resources for health policy
Published in
Human Resources for Health, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1478-4491-11-64
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pamela A McQuide, Riitta-Liisa Kolehmainen-Aitken, Norbert Forster

Abstract

As part of ongoing efforts to restructure the health sector and improve health care quality, the Ministry of Health and Social Services (MoHSS) in Namibia sought to update staffing norms for health facilities. To establish an evidence base for the new norms, the MoHSS supported the first-ever national application of the Workload Indicators of Staffing Need (WISN) method, a human resource management tool developed by the World Health Organization.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 287 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 277 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 60 21%
Researcher 30 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 9%
Student > Bachelor 23 8%
Lecturer 14 5%
Other 55 19%
Unknown 78 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 80 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 16%
Business, Management and Accounting 14 5%
Social Sciences 10 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 3%
Other 45 16%
Unknown 81 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2023.
All research outputs
#3,671,302
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#442
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,111
of 320,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#8
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.