↓ Skip to main content

Intraluminal hyperglycaemia causes conduit and resistance artery dilatation and inhibits vascular autoregulation in the anaesthetised pig

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intraluminal hyperglycaemia causes conduit and resistance artery dilatation and inhibits vascular autoregulation in the anaesthetised pig
Published in
Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, July 2013
DOI 10.1139/cjpp-2013-0206
Pubmed ID
Authors

Therese Ruane-O’Hora, Christine M. Shortt, Deirdre Edge, Farouk Markos, Mark I.M. Noble

Abstract

The effect of intraluminal hyperglycaemia was investigated in the iliac artery of 11 anaesthetised pigs. Following isolation of a test segment, hyperglycaemic blood (40 mmol·L(-1)) caused a significant dilatation of the artery of 167 ± 208 μm (mean ± SD; n = 6, P = 0.031). Dilatations were reduced by N(G)-nitro-l-arginine methyl esther (250 μg·mL(-1)) from 145 ± 199 to 38 ± 5 μm), but this was not statistically significant (n = 6, P = 0.18). Intra-arterial infusions of d-glucose (20-40 mmol·L(-1)·min(-1)), during graded constrictions, caused statistically significant increases in blood flow (n = 11, P = 0.0013). Vasodilatation was confirmed by measurements of the ratio of immediate pressure steps to flow steps (∂P/∂F) during the graded obstruction experiments, showing a decrease in instantaneous vascular resistance from a control of 0.62 ± 0.30 to 0.33 ± 0.34 mm Hg·mL(-1)·min(-1) (n = 7, P = 0.016). Autoregulation was assessed from the slopes of the plots of steady-state flow versus pressure. There were significant increases in the slope from 2.32 ± 1.03 to 5.88 ± 5.60 mL·min(-1)·(mm Hg)(-1) (n = 7, P = 0.0078), indicating significant impairment of autoregulation. In conclusion, luminal hyperglycaemia relaxes both arterial and resistance vessel smooth muscle.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 25%
Student > Postgraduate 1 25%
Other 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 25%
Computer Science 1 25%
Neuroscience 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2013.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology
#1,331
of 1,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,075
of 209,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology
#8
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,696 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.