| Title |
The relevance of socio-demographic and occupational variables for the assessment of work-related stress risk
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1157 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alessandro Marinaccio, Pierpaolo Ferrante, Marisa Corfiati, Cristina Di Tecco, Bruna M Rondinone, Michela Bonafede, Matteo Ronchetti, Benedetta Persechino, Sergio Iavicoli |
| Abstract |
Work-related stress is widely recognized as one of the major challenges to occupational health and safety. The correlation between work-related stress risk factors and physical health outcomes is widely acknowledged. This study investigated socio-demographic and occupational variables involved in perceived risk of work-related stress. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 162 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 12% |
| Researcher | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 34 | 21% |
| Unknown | 43 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 17% |
| Psychology | 24 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 9% |
| Engineering | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 14% |
| Unknown | 47 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2013.
All research outputs
#13,050,013
of 22,736,112 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,101
of 14,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,448
of 306,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#159
of 258 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,736,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 258 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.