↓ Skip to main content

Vitamin Supplementation Benefits in Master Athletes

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
25 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
Title
Vitamin Supplementation Benefits in Master Athletes
Published in
Sports Medicine, December 2013
DOI 10.1007/s40279-013-0126-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeanick Brisswalter, Julien Louis

Abstract

Master athletes are more than 35 years of age and continue to train as hard as their young counterparts despite the aging process. All life long, they are capable of accomplishing exceptional sporting performances. For these participants in endurance events, matching energy intake and expenditure is critical to maintain health and performance. The proportions of carbohydrate, fat, and protein must be optimized to provide enough calories to sustain the energy requirements of competition or training, and for recovery. In addition, endurance athletes must include adequate vitamins and minerals in their diets to maintain healthy immune function. Vitamins and minerals may be sufficient in the diets of endurance athletes, who have a high energy intake. This would make it unnecessary to use vitamin and mineral supplements. Furthermore, one major limitation for these athletes is the management of oxidative stress, which, when in excess, can be deleterious for the organism. For individuals exposed to oxidative stress, micronutritional supplementations rich in vitamins and minerals can be also an alternative strategy. Although these supplementations are increasingly used by master athletes, very few data are available on their effects on oxidative stress, muscle recovery, and physical performance. The potential benefits of supplement use in athletes are thus questionable. Some studies indicate no benefits, while others highlight potential negative side effects of vitamin supplementation. Additional studies are warranted in order to design adapted prescriptions in antioxidant vitamins and minerals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 157 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 31 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 13%
Student > Master 17 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 33 20%
Unknown 42 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 35 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 47 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2014.
All research outputs
#2,046,540
of 25,231,854 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#1,417
of 2,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,772
of 320,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#15
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,231,854 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,899 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.