You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ovarian carcinoma histotype determination is highly reproducible, and is improved through the use of immunohistochemistry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Histopathology, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1111/his.12349 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin Köbel, Julia Bak, Björn I Bertelsen, Olli Carpen, Anni Grove, Estrid S Hansen, Anne‐Marie Levin Jakobsen, Marianne Lidang, Anna Måsbäck, Anna Tolf, C Blake Gilks, Joseph W Carlson |
| Abstract |
To assess the variation in ovarian carcinoma type diagnosis among gynaecological pathologists from Nordic countries, and whether a rationally designed panel of immunohistochemical markers could improve diagnostic reproducibility. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 74 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 15% |
| Researcher | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 23% |
| Unknown | 19 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 41% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 24 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2013.
All research outputs
#14,566,885
of 24,558,777 outputs
Outputs from Histopathology
#2,067
of 3,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,944
of 226,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Histopathology
#32
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,558,777 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,414 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.