↓ Skip to main content

Outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty revision with glenoid reconstruction and bone grafting

Overview of attention for article published in International Orthopaedics, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Outcomes after shoulder arthroplasty revision with glenoid reconstruction and bone grafting
Published in
International Orthopaedics, December 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00264-013-2191-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Hoffelner, Philipp Moroder, Alexander Auffarth, Mark Tauber, Herbert Resch

Abstract

Extensive glenoid bone loss after failed shoulder arthroplasty represents a challenge for revision arthroplasty. Treatment options vary widely and have been a source of controversy among experts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 11%
Other 4 9%
Researcher 3 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 10 22%
Unknown 17 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Engineering 2 4%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 19 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2013.
All research outputs
#18,357,514
of 22,736,112 outputs
Outputs from International Orthopaedics
#1,071
of 1,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,634
of 306,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Orthopaedics
#30
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,736,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,425 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.