↓ Skip to main content

Meeting report – Arf and Rab family G proteins

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cell Science, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Meeting report – Arf and Rab family G proteins
Published in
Journal of Cell Science, November 2013
DOI 10.1242/jcs.143610
Pubmed ID
Authors

James E. Casanova, Victor W. Hsu, Catherine L. Jackson, Richard A. Kahn, Craig R. Roy, Jennifer L. Stow, Angela Wandinger-Ness, Elizabeth Sztul

Abstract

A FASEB Summer Research Conference entitled 'Arf and Rab family G proteins' was held in July 2013 at Snowmass Village, Snowmass, Colorado. Arfs and Rabs are two families of GTPases that control membrane trafficking in eukaryotic cells, and increasing evidence indicates that their functions are tightly coordinated. Because many workers in this field have focused on only one family, this meeting was designed to integrate our understanding of the two families. The conference was organized by Elizabeth Sztul (University of Alabama, Birmingham, USA) and Jim Casanova (University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA), and provided an opportunity for approximately 90 scientists to communicate their work and discuss future directions for the field. The talks highlighted the structural, functional and regulatory properties of Arf and Rab GTPases and the need to develop coordinated approaches to investigate them. Here, we present the major themes that emerged from the meeting.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 4%
Netherlands 1 4%
United Kingdom 1 4%
China 1 4%
Japan 1 4%
Unknown 21 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 27%
Professor 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 62%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 35%
Unknown 1 4%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2013.
All research outputs
#15,170,530
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cell Science
#6,360
of 9,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,764
of 320,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cell Science
#108
of 286 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 286 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.