| Title |
Menstrual and fertility outcomes following the surgical management of postpartum haemorrhage: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1471-0528.12546 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
SK Doumouchtsis, K Nikolopoulos, VS Talaulikar, A Krishna, S Arulkumaran |
| Abstract |
Uterine-sparing surgical interventions have long been practiced as an alternative to hysterectomy in the management of severe postpartum haemorrhage (PPH); however, the risks of impairment of subsequent fertility from such procedures are unclear. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Japan | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 68 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 15% |
| Researcher | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 18% |
| Unknown | 10 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 61% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2014.
All research outputs
#7,204,326
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#2,929
of 6,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,005
of 320,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#31
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,848 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.