↓ Skip to main content

Rare coding variants in the phospholipase D3 gene confer risk for Alzheimer’s disease

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
76 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
407 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
631 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rare coding variants in the phospholipase D3 gene confer risk for Alzheimer’s disease
Published in
Nature, December 2013
DOI 10.1038/nature12825
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlos Cruchaga, Celeste M. Karch, Sheng Chih Jin, Bruno A. Benitez, Yefei Cai, Rita Guerreiro, Oscar Harari, Joanne Norton, John Budde, Sarah Bertelsen, Amanda T. Jeng, Breanna Cooper, Tara Skorupa, David Carrell, Denise Levitch, Simon Hsu, Jiyoon Choi, Mina Ryten, Celeste Sassi, Jose Bras, J. Raphael Gibbs, Dena G. Hernandez, Michelle K. Lupton, John Powell, Paola Forabosco, Perry G. Ridge, Christopher D. Corcoran, JoAnn T. Tschanz, Maria C. Norton, Ronald G. Munger, Cameron Schmutz, Maegan Leary, F. Yesim Demirci, Mikhil N. Bamne, Xingbin Wang, Oscar L. Lopez, Mary Ganguli, Christopher Medway, James Turton, Jenny Lord, Anne Braae, Imelda Barber, Kristelle Brown, Pau Pastor, Oswaldo Lorenzo-Betancor, Zoran Brkanac, Erick Scott, Eric Topol, Kevin Morgan, Ekaterina Rogaeva, Andrew B. Singleton, John Hardy, M. Ilyas Kamboh, Peter St George-Hyslop, Nigel Cairns, John C. Morris, John S. K. Kauwe, Alison M. Goate

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 631 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 1%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Luxembourg 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 596 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 143 23%
Researcher 142 23%
Student > Master 55 9%
Student > Bachelor 37 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 36 6%
Other 134 21%
Unknown 84 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 179 28%
Neuroscience 87 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 85 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 84 13%
Psychology 14 2%
Other 72 11%
Unknown 110 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 203. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2022.
All research outputs
#196,806
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#11,745
of 98,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,690
of 324,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#142
of 936 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 936 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.