| Title |
Implementing large-scale workforce change: learning from 55 pilot sites of allied health workforce redesign in Queensland, Australia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Resources for Health, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-4491-11-66 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Susan A Nancarrow, Alison Roots, Sandra Grace, Anna M Moran, Kerry Vanniekerk-Lyons |
| Abstract |
Increasingly, health workforces are undergoing high-level 're-engineering' to help them better meet the needs of the population, workforce and service delivery. Queensland Health implemented a large scale 5-year workforce redesign program across more than 13 health-care disciplines. This study synthesized the findings from this program to identify and codify mechanisms associated with successful workforce redesign to help inform other large workforce projects. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 36% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Poland | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 18% |
| Researcher | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
| Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 21% |
| Unknown | 20 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 22% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 9% |
| Psychology | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 23 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,996,166
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#354
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,089
of 320,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#8
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.