| Title |
Rhodiola rosea L.: from golden root to green cell factories
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Phytochemistry Reviews, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11101-016-9453-5 |
| Authors |
Andrey S. Marchev, Albena T. Dinkova-Kostova, Zsuzsanna György, Iman Mirmazloum, Ina Y. Aneva, Milen I. Georgiev |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hungary | 1 | 2% |
| Serbia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 52 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 17% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 18 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 22 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2017.
All research outputs
#23,196,437
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Phytochemistry Reviews
#343
of 379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#347,064
of 405,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Phytochemistry Reviews
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.