| Title |
Teamwork Assessment in Internal Medicine: A Systematic Review of Validity Evidence and Outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-013-2686-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rachel D. A. Havyer, Majken T. Wingo, Nneka I. Comfere, Darlene R. Nelson, Andrew J. Halvorsen, Furman S. McDonald, Darcy A. Reed |
| Abstract |
Valid teamwork assessment is imperative to determine physician competency and optimize patient outcomes. We systematically reviewed published instruments assessing teamwork in undergraduate, graduate, and continuing medical education in general internal medicine and all medical subspecialties. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 23% |
| United States | 2 | 15% |
| Japan | 1 | 8% |
| Brazil | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 38% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 38% |
| Scientists | 2 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 247 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 14% |
| Researcher | 18 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 17 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 63 | 25% |
| Unknown | 61 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 72 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 45 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 6% |
| Psychology | 14 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 10% |
| Unknown | 69 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,513,996
of 24,792,414 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,861
of 8,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,615
of 319,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#15
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,792,414 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,016 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.