You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Experimental Distribution of Entanglement with Separable Carriers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Physical Review Letters, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1103/physrevlett.111.230504 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. Fedrizzi, M. Zuppardo, G. G. Gillett, M. A. Broome, M. P. Almeida, M. Paternostro, A. G. White, T. Paterek |
| Abstract |
The key requirement for quantum networking is the distribution of entanglement between nodes. Surprisingly, entanglement can be generated across a network without direct transfer-or communication-of entanglement. In contrast to information gain, which cannot exceed the communicated information, the entanglement gain is bounded by the communicated quantum discord, a more general measure of quantum correlation that includes but is not limited to entanglement. Here, we experimentally entangle two communicating parties sharing three initially separable photonic qubits by exchange of a carrier photon that is unentangled with either party at all times. We show that distributing entanglement with separable carriers is resilient to noise and in some cases becomes the only way of distributing entanglement through noisy environments. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Russia | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 67 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 34% |
| Researcher | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 11 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 62 | 81% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 1% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 12 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2024.
All research outputs
#491,962
of 25,253,876 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review Letters
#1,247
of 38,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,699
of 320,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review Letters
#9
of 581 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,253,876 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 38,091 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 581 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.