| Title |
Baby-Led Weaning: The Evidence to Date
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Nutrition Reports, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13668-017-0201-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amy Brown, Sara Wyn Jones, Hannah Rowan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 139 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 56 | 40% |
| Spain | 19 | 14% |
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| Ireland | 4 | 3% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Cayman Islands | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 44 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 87 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 38 | 27% |
| Scientists | 10 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 520 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 519 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 111 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 54 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 28 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 5% |
| Researcher | 24 | 5% |
| Other | 68 | 13% |
| Unknown | 208 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 150 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 91 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 3% |
| Psychology | 12 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 29 | 6% |
| Unknown | 217 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 272. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#132,959
of 25,547,904 outputs
Outputs from Current Nutrition Reports
#7
of 383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,895
of 325,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Nutrition Reports
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,547,904 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.