↓ Skip to main content

Low expectations: Do teachers underestimate the ability of overweight children or the children of overweight mothers?

Overview of attention for article published in Economics & Human Biology, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Low expectations: Do teachers underestimate the ability of overweight children or the children of overweight mothers?
Published in
Economics & Human Biology, April 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.ehb.2017.04.006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle Queally, Edel Doherty, Francis M. Finucane, Ciaran O’Neill

Abstract

Using the first wave of the Growing Up in Ireland Survey of nine year old children we examine whether a teacher's assessment of their pupil's academic ability is influenced by the weight status of the child and/or the child's mother. Multivariate regression analyses of the teacher's assessment, controlling for the child's actual test performance, their BMI, their mother's BMI, other socio-demographic and teacher characteristics were undertaken. The study highlighted that child BMI was not a significant determinant but that children whose mother was obese were more likely to be rated as below average in reading and in maths compared to those whose mother was leaner, after adjusting for their measured ability. The potential for mother's weight status to influence teachers' assessments of their children's perceived ability could have long term ramifications for educational outcomes and warrants further study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 7 18%
Student > Master 7 18%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 11 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Sports and Recreations 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 15 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,784,838
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Economics & Human Biology
#225
of 852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,809
of 324,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economics & Human Biology
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 852 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.