↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Applications for Maggots in Wound Care

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Clinical Dermatology, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
9 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
117 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
Clinical Applications for Maggots in Wound Care
Published in
American Journal of Clinical Dermatology, August 2012
DOI 10.2165/00128071-200102040-00003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kosta Y. Mumcuoglu

Abstract

Maggot debridement therapy (MDT) was first introduced in the US in 1931 and was routinely used there until mid-1940s in over 300 hospitals. With the advent of antibacterials, maggot therapy became rare until the early 1990s, when it was re-introduced first in the US, and later in Israel, the UK, Germany, Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine and Thailand. Sterile maggots of the green bottle fly, Lucilia (Phaenicia) sericata, are used for MDT. Up to 1000 maggots are introduced in the wound and left for 1 to 3 days. MDT could be used for any kind of purulent, sloughy wound on the skin, independent of the underlying diseases or the location on the body for ambulatory as well as for hospitalized patients. One of the major advantages of MDT is that the maggots separate the necrotic tissue from the living tissue, making a surgical debridement easier. In 80 to 95% of the cases, a complete or significant debridement of the wound is achieved. As therapy progresses, new layers of healthy tissue are formed over the wounds. The offensive odor emanating from the necrotic tissue and the intense pain accompanying the wound decrease significantly. In a significant number of patients, an immediate amputation can be prevented as a result of MDT. In other cases, a more proximal amputation could be avoided. It is also possible that in patients with deep wounds, where septicemia is a serious threat, this can be prevented as a result of MDT. The majority of patients do not complain of any major discomfort during the treatment. Psychological and esthetic considerations are obvious. Maggots can occasionally cause a tickling or itching sensation. Approximately 20 to 25% of the patients with superficial, painful wounds, complain of increased pain during treatment with maggots, and are treated with analgesics. MDT has been proven to be an effective method for cleaning chronic wounds and initiating granulation. It is a simple, efficient, well tolerated and cost-effective tool for the treatment of wounds and ulcers, which do not respond to conventional treatment and surgical intervention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 109 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 17%
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 25 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 5%
Psychology 5 5%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 28 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,580,229
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Dermatology
#108
of 1,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,542
of 186,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Dermatology
#25
of 281 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 281 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.